Doctors should no longer decide what information a patient should be given before agreeing to treatment, the UK Supreme Court has ruled in a historic judgment. The age of “medical paternalism” is over, and healthcare is now a partnership between patients and professionals, seven justices declared unanimously in the most important UK judgment on informed consent for 30 years. The judgment sweeps...

Since its establishment in 2003, the Constitutional Court of Indonesia (the CCI) has been playing an important role securing basic democratic order, rule law and fundamental rights protection Indonesia. Despite achievements, however, Indonesian constitutional adjudication system also raised public comments criticisms, due to deficiencies organizational system, including appointment, supervision...

The Constitutional Court ruling on the third amendment to Law is worth discussing. In judicial review, justices judged a case in which they have interests. interests are related requirement for being justice, term of office justices, and chief justice deputy justice. Can be impartial? This study aimed at three things. First, analyzing their interpretation through legal annotation. Second, ident...

this study was conducted to examine the­ relationship between organizational  justice and social capital in the telecommunication company of mianeh in 1391 that lasted one year. in this study, organizational justice as one of the major factors underlying the creation of social capital, has been studied in three dimensions (distributive justice, procedural justice and interactional justice), and...

FOLLOWING THE U.S. SUPREME COURT’S 2015 DECISION IN REED V. TOWN OF GILBERT, ARIZONA. In Reed, all nine Supreme Court justices agreed that the Town of Gilbert’s sign code violated the guarantee of freedom of speech in the First Amendment, although the justices arrived at that conclusion in different ways. As this article will discuss, the Court’s opinion in Reed focused on the appropriate meani...