In the scientific article author conducts a study of foreign experience legal regulation judicial protection family rights parents and children, primarily under legislation certain states European Union (such as Germany, France, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland, Hungary, Latvia, Estonia) Republic Moldova. Based on conducted research, comes to conclusion that in German civil French legislation, ...

A number of prominent and often well-reasoned cases have increasingly defined a limited right, on the part of involuntarily detained psychiatric patients, to refuse treatment.3-12 Historically, most of these cases dealt with prisoners,6 or with patients who had religious objections to the treatments being imposed.3 However, as the mental health bar expanded and as scholarly critiques proliferat...

nowadays, the effort for ease of doing business is the more important worry in transition economies in the way of reaching in economic development and high competitiveness. according to intuitionalism theories, the inefficiency of judicial system causes to increase trade costs, and so, violates the business environment. by studying the rank of iran's ease in doing business between other world c...

principles of judicial review in administrative law are basic criteria developed through judicial decisions. most of these principles have a legal value in modern administrative law. in this paper some of these principles and criteria have been studied in switzerland administrative law. in this country the legality, equality, public interest, good faith, hearing and proportionality principles h...

The judicial production of law and the legislative production of law make a striking distinction between the two legal traditions. Despite of these differences, judges in both legal traditions in adjudicating cases have a common task, which is the application of legal rules to the facts of cases pending for judgments. The tension between the certainty and the “discretion” is universal for any l...

presumed to hold. Historians can work only with the published Minutes, and other official documents. The GMC and its members have published a number of accounts of the Council's work and history during this century, but a definitive history of the Council and its relationship to the wider history of medicine remains to be written. Russell Smith's book is, however, a large step in this direction...

While scholars have long probed the original understanding of judicial review and the early judicial review case law, this Article presents a study of the judicial review case law in the United States before Marbury v. Madison that is dramatically more complete than prior work and that challenges previous scholarship on the original understanding of judicial review on the two most critical dime...