The arguments presented by González-Nuevo et al. (2006) in favour of theMexican Hat Wavelet Family (MHWF) are critically discussed here. These authors allege the optimal properties of this new class of filters in the detection of point sources embedded in a noise background but their claim is not based upon a solid mathematical foundation and proof.

Abstract App reviews found in app stores can provide critically valuable information to help software engineers understand user requirements and design, debug, evolve products. Over the last ten years, a vast amount of research has been produced study what useful might be reviews, how mine organise such as efficiently possible. This paper presents comprehensive survey this research, covering 18...

The first contribution of this article is a politico-philosophical map that, drawing upon two common sets arguments against modern natural rights, might help to explain the prevailing neo-republican position on rights. Under label ‘abstraction argument’, we explore view that rights are metaphysical construct usually ends in violent application speculative principles society. ‘self-interest disc...

arthur schopenhauer, in four aspects root of the principle of sufficient reason, criticized kant’s interpretation of causality, which is written in the second analogy contained in the section of principles of pure understanding. these criticisms express themselves along three main axes. by considering these criticisms, this article seeks to defend kant’s account and to show that schopenhauer di...

Abstract In this contribution, we explore the plausibility and consequences of treating arguments over what counts as a COVID-19 death metalinguistic arguments. While unquestionably related to epidemiological public health issues, these are also about how term should be used. As such, they touch upon some foundational issues in meta-semantics, discussed recent literature on negotiations, concep...

This paper is an inquiry into the largely unexamined analysis of arguments by analogy (ABA). By exposing the degree of philosophical complexity, which ultimately renders evaluation of ABA subjective, we shall see that the most appropriate doxastic attitude to adopt, with respect to the conclusions drawn from these arguments, is often suspension of judgment. A critical examination of Copi’s crit...

Abstract The authors analyse the constitutionality of Ordinance and restrictions constitutional rights freedoms imposed by Slovenian Government. They systematically consistently present arguments on unlawfulness unconstitutionality nature Government (part 1). decision Constitutional Court legality measures is critically commented. In following one presents analysis regarding new ordinances take...

This article critically examines the view that the signal detection theory (SDT) interpretation of the remember-know (RK) paradigm has been ruled out by the evidence. The author evaluates 5 empirical arguments against a database of 72 studies reporting RK data under 400 different conditions. These arguments concern (a). the functional independence of remember and know rates, (b). the invariance...