نتایج جستجو برای: multiple criteria ranking

تعداد نتایج: 1020984  

Journal: :تحقیقات مالی 0
علی اصغر انواری رستمی استاد دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران شهامت حسینیان عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه علوم انتظامی مرتضی رضایی اصل کارشناس ارشد مدیریت صنعتی، گرایش تحقیق در عملیات، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

nowadays, liveliness and rapid maintenance of the development process of the companies are dependent on the accurate and complete understanding of the merits of the financial activities. since these merits are relative concepts that are based on comparisons, lists of ranking and comparison of industries with each other act as useful signposts for managers, politicians, and investors. the point ...

Journal: :European Journal of Operational Research 2008
Salvatore Greco Vincent Mousseau Roman Slowinski

We present a new method, called UTA, for multiple criteria ranking of alternatives from set A using a set of additive value functions which result from an ordinal regression. The preference information provided by the decision maker is a set of pairwise comparisons on a subset of alternatives A A, called reference alternatives. The preference model built via ordinal regression is the set of all...

Journal: :Expert Syst. Appl. 2007
Mu-Chen Chen

In data mining applications, it is important to develop evaluation methods for selecting quality and profitable rules. This paper utilizes a non-parametric approach, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), to estimate and rank the efficiency of association rules with multiple criteria. The interestingness of association rules is conventionally measured based on support and confidence. For specific app...

Journal: :Knowl.-Based Syst. 2015
Milosz Kadzinski Roman Slowinski Salvatore Greco

We introduce a new multiple criteria ranking/choice method that applies Dominance-based Rough Set Approach (DRSA) and represents the Decision Maker’s (DM’s) preferences with decision rules. The DM provides a set of pairwise comparisons indicating whether an outranking (weak preference) relation should hold for some pairs of reference alternatives. This preference information is structured using...

2011
Alessandro Ferrarini

Ecological ranking is a prerequisite to many kinds of environmental decisions. It requires a set of “objects” (e.g., competing sites for species reintroduction, or competing alternatives of environmental management) to be evaluated on the basis of multiple weighted criteria, and then ranked from the best to the worst, or vice versa. The resulting ranking is then used to choose the course of an ...

Journal: :4OR 2021

Multiple criteria decision aid methodologies support makers (DM) facing decisions involving conflicting objectives. DM’s preferences should be captured to provide meaningful recommendations. Preference elicitation aims at incorporating in models. We propose a new preference tool for ranking model based on reference points (RMP—Ranking with Profiles). Our methodology infers an RMP from list of p...

There are many algorithms for optimizing the search engine results, ranking takes place according to one or more parameters such as; Backward Links, Forward Links, Content, click through rate and etc. The quality and performance of these algorithms depend on the listed parameters. The ranking is one of the most important components of the search engine that represents the degree of the vitality...

Journal: :Expert Syst. Appl. 2012
Ginger Y. Ke Kevin W. Li Keith W. Hipel

An integrative conflict analysis approach, incorporating an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) based preference ranking method into the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution (GMCR), is employed to investigate the Canadian west coast port congestion dispute. The Canadian west coast has historically been an important gateway connecting North America to Asia thanks to its specific geographical and str...

Journal: :INFORMS Trans. Education 2014
Chris Tofallis

Simple additive weighting is a well-known method for scoring and ranking alternative options based on multiple attributes. However the pitfalls associated with this approach are not widely appreciated. For example, the apparently innocuous step of normalizing the various attribute data in order to obtain comparable figures leads to markedly different rankings depending on which normalization is...

The purpose of this paper is to fully ranking decision-making units using a combination of multi-criteria decision-making techniques and data envelopment analysis. Due to this fact that weights play an important role in ranking the options by multi-criteria decision-making methods and most of these methods have weakness in using weighting methods, therefore the ability for data envelopment anal...

نمودار تعداد نتایج جستجو در هر سال

با کلیک روی نمودار نتایج را به سال انتشار فیلتر کنید