Abstract Recently, Stefan Wintein published an article in which he presents four objections to my modal-epistemic argument for the existence of God. His first objection is alleged counterexample argument’s premise, and second premise. Wintein’s third attempts show that circular. Finally, fourth a parody objection. In this paper, I all fail.

This article explores the approach of international human rights bodies to conscientious objection abortion, by requiring states implement mandatory referral mechanisms where is permitted. This, however, represents an inadequate compromise position as many objecting healthcare professionals also object and circumvent those requirements. Furthermore, cannot address broader issues with overuse mi...

ON 6 November 2003, the International Court of Justice delivered its long-awaited judgment in Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America). The judgment raises important issues relating to both jurisdiction and the law governing the use of force. By way of background, the Court was seised of a claim by Iran and a counterclaim by the USA alleging breaches of their 1955 bi...