Professional Original Effective Date: August 9, 2005 Institutional Original Effective Date: August 9, 2005 Revision Date(s): June 14, 2006; January 1, 2007; July 24, 2007; September 25 2007; February 22, 2010; March 10, 2011; March 8, 2013 Revision Date(s): June 14, 2006; January 1, 2007; July 24, 2007; September 25 2007; February 22, 2010; March 1

Article history: Received 2 June 2010 Received in revised form 24 September 2010 Accepted 26 September 2010 Available online xxxx

Article history: Received 24 February 2010 Received in revised form 4 June 2010 Accepted 6 July 2010 Available online 16 July 2010

Article history: Received 24 March 2010 Received in revised form 1 May 2010 Accepted 1 May 2010 Available online 16 June 2010

Article history: Received 10 June 2009 Received in revised form 20 August 2010 Accepted 24 August 2010 Available online 20 September 2010 Communicated by P.M.B. Vitányi

Article history: Received 14 September 2009 Received in revised form 19 May 2010 Accepted 24 June 2010 Available online 22 July 2010

The candidate response is detailed, thorough and sustained from the outset and the response is analytical and clearly links analysis between the micro aspects of the TV drama to that of gender representation; this is exemplified throughout the candidate response. The candidate begins by analysing the technical feature of editing, the richest of the micro features to disarm and discuss and does ...