Abstract This study considers the notion of divine simplicity, idea that God is not a composite more basic features, and criticisms by al-Ghazālī (d. 1111) Alvin Plantinga doctrine. What shown most argumentation against simplicity frequently credited to had been nearly perfectly anticipated al-Ghazālī. Moreover, in responding stronger form which Avicenna 1037) presented, than Thomistic version ...

This article deals with Alvin Plantinga’s arguments against St. Thomas Aquinas’s third way to show that God exists. Although attacks on this argument have come from Christians and non-Christians, my contention is these rebuttals of the arise because a misunderstanding itself. Thus, metaphysical background for understanding first explained, then Plantinga raises it are dealt with. After reading ...

belief in the existence of god has always been attacked by opponents. one of them is the so called evidentalism challenge. in this paper, the opinions of allama muhammad hussain tabataba, and alvin plantinga about the above mentioned challenge are discussed and compared. although both believe that belief in god does’nt need to be proved and arguments just support the faith but, belonging to a t...

Alvin Plantinga (1993a, 1993b, 2000) argues that de jure objections to theism depend on facto objections: in order say belief God is not warranted, one should first assume this false. Assuming Plantinga’s epistemology and his facto/de distinction, In essay, I argue show miracles must suppose always Therefore, a person who holds skeptical position regarding choose either find evidence all of the...

Agnosticism has always had its fair amount of criticism. Religious believers often described the first agnostics as infidels and it is not uncommon to see them somewhat dull fence-sitters. Moreover, undecided agnostic stance on belief in gods compared with being unsure about such obviously false statements existence orbiting teapots, invisible dragons or even Santa Claus. In this paper, I maint...

Abstract In ‘God, evil, and occasionalism’ Matthew Shea C.P. Ragland appeal to the Doctrine of Doing Allowing argue against Alvin Plantinga that occasionalism is morally worse than conservationism. this article I critically examine their argument conclude it fails because contains an equivocation or unwarranted. also offer a case position by, first, arguing on none three prominent accounts doin...