Abstract When involved in a disagreement, common reaction is to tell oneself that, given that the information about one's own epistemic standing clearly superior both amount and quality opponent's standing, one justified confidence view correct. In line with this natural some contributors debate on its significance have claimed can stick guns by relying part first-order evidence functioning of ...

An active area of public health policy in the United States is policy meant to promote healthy eating, reduce overconsumption of food, and prevent overweight/obesity. Public discussion of such obesity prevention policies includes intense ethical disagreement. We suggest that some ethical disagreements about obesity prevention policies can be seen as rooted in a common concern with equality or w...

How do disagreements between judges on collegial (multimember) courts affect legal policy? We address this question by developing an account of the nature of judicial disagreements in the case-space model of judicial choice. We distinguish between different types of disagreement, from disagreements about case facts to disagreements about how legal rules should treat varying case facts, and cons...

In production processes, e.g. J/Ψ → ωππ or p̄p → 3π, the σ and f0(980) overlap in the same partial wave. The conjecture of Extended Unitarity (EU) states that the ππ pair should have the same phase variation as ππ elastic scattering. This is an extension of Watson’s theorem beyond its original derivation, which stated only that the s-dependence of a single resonance should be universal. The pred...