نتایج جستجو برای: iranian criminal law
تعداد نتایج: 222045 فیلتر نتایج به سال:
disproportionate punishments are those punishments passed or enforced without considering the criteria of proportionality, namely the criteria of harm done, the absolute or relative seriousness of crimes, the kind of committed crime and offender characteristics, the degree and kind of victim’s culpability. considering the penological aims, such as retribution, deterrence and securing social def...
as a rule, like other criminal legal systems, insane people are exempted from criminal liability in iranian criminal law. the previous penal code, replaced in 1982, had classified the mentally ill people into two groups. those completely insane were totally free from criminal liability and those suffering from less serious mental illnesses benefit to some extent liable to a certain lenient degr...
actions against individual liberty are crime in which an officialviolates individual's liberty while doing his job. although iranian.and french legislators were pioneers in criminalizing such acts buta comparison of criminal laws of two mentioned above countriesshows that french criminal law saves personal liberty moreeffectively than the iranian one
Objective: Disable people need special legal attention. In this regard, special rules have been gradually developed by domestic and international law. Convention for the Protection of the Disabled Disability (2006) in the international community and the Iranian Act of comprehensive protection of the disable people (1383) in a national community are examples of above mentioned legal develop...
Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the American Politics Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law and Society Commons, Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Com...
Different nations’ tendency to expand their judicial and legislative territory outside their ruling kingdom has caused conflicts in the criminal qualification and the coming into existence of legal bad effects. Among these bad effects is the double or additional punishment of someone who has been tried and received their penalty in another country before, which is at odds with the principles of...
Criminal sanctions are usually public, stable and predictable. In contrast, the practices governing the determination of the probability of detection and conviction reinforce uncertainty. We invoke psychological insights to illustrate that criminals prefer a scheme in which the size of the sentence is uncertain while the probability of detection and conviction is certain. Consequently, the choi...
Women with mental disabilities confront sexual assault at an alarming rate. We have argued elsewhere that this reality should be reflected in our understanding of the concepts of consent and capacity in the criminal law of sexual assault (Benedet and Grant 2007a; Benedet and Grant 2007b). In this paper, we examine recent developments in Canadian sexual assault law and consider whether they are ...
Subjectivism or Objectivism of insanity, as one of the eliminators of criminal responsibility, are challenges under attention regarding the psychotherapy findings about the criminal responsibility of the lunatics. The difference between the two is that if insanity has subjectivism to eliminate criminal responsibility, its authentication by judicial authority leads to eliminate the criminal resp...
نمودار تعداد نتایج جستجو در هر سال
با کلیک روی نمودار نتایج را به سال انتشار فیلتر کنید