نتایج جستجو برای: consensual opinion of jurisprudents
تعداد نتایج: 21167634 فیلتر نتایج به سال:
Endowment under Islamic law is a permanent type of contract which cannot be revoked and it is a consensus among Shiite jurisprudents. It is a kind of contract which has been based upon a religious thoughts as well as provides great heavenly reward and includes social and economic effects. These are special characters which lead Endowment to be a more concrete contract with special imperative ru...
این تحقیق به منظور یافتن تاثیر دو نوع task به نام های information gap و opinion gap بر روی نوشتار زبان آموزان برون گرا بوده است. به این منظور گروهی از 110 دانش آموز دبیرستانی به پرسشنامه آیزنک پاسخ دادند که از بین آنها 91 دانش آموز برون گرا انتخاب شد. این 91 نفر قبل از شروع کار برای همگون سازی در آزمون پت شرکت کردند. در نهایت دو گروه که یک گروه شامل 32 دانش آموز با opinion gap taskو یک گروه 30 ...
In recent years Irish society has witnessed an upheaval in public opinion before the discovery of conspiracies silence hiding stories institutional abuse which had remained concealed from domain. These narratives secrecy have been consistently identified and stripped away by writers like Emer Martin whose novel The Cruelty Men (2018) denounces fact that forgetting are woven into fabric politics...
The divergence of Qur'anic readings in some verses has led to divisions in the commentators, translators and jurisprudents` understanding and interpretation. Regarding the reasons for unlawfulness of kissing non-mahrams and the commentators and scholars` views and relying the verse " ow Laamastum al-Nisa`", this article studies the differences between the readings of the above verse and its eff...
Following the development of medical science new problems have emerged in this discipline that such as miscarriage, change of sexuality, dissection, artificial insemination, and selling blood. Muslim physicians are interested to know the religious decrees of these issues. This paper is an attempt to study the issue of dissection. According to Shiah jurisprudents, dissection was illegal in its e...
In his famous dichotomy of consensual versus majoritarian democracies, Lijphart ~1984! claims that “consensual” means are more applicable in heterogeneous societies, while “majoritarian” means are more adequate in homogenous societies. While discussing at length many features of both consensual and majoritarian democracy, Lijphart refrains from reaching a conclusion concerning the desirability ...
1. My comments will neither suggest what is right or wrong about culling, but rather speak to approaches we can take in resolving untidy and complex ethical issues that encumber the elephant culling issue. It must be noted that the issue of elephant culling holds parallels for other types of ethical questions that concern wildlife, and how humans should manage them. What is of interest to me is...
there are different views, about the authenticity of esteshal (masalehe morsalah), among the religious jurisprudences of sunnite and emamieh. each of them has offered arguments possibly in rejecting and proving esteslah, but they took an extreme in their arguments. the present study attempts to prove that esteslah, which had been presented by jurisprudents, in the context of social issues, is d...
نمودار تعداد نتایج جستجو در هر سال
با کلیک روی نمودار نتایج را به سال انتشار فیلتر کنید