for a graph $g$ let $gamma (g)$ be its domination number. we define a graph g to be (i) a hypo-efficient domination graph (or a hypo-$mathcal{ed}$ graph) if $g$ has no efficient dominating set (eds) but every graph formed by removing a single vertex from $g$ has at least one eds, and (ii) a hypo-unique domination graph (a hypo-$mathcal{ud}$ graph) if $g$ has at least two minimum dominating sets...

For a graph $G$ let $gamma (G)$ be its domination number. We define a graph G to be (i) a hypo-efficient domination graph (or a hypo-$mathcal{ED}$ graph) if $G$ has no efficient dominating set (EDS) but every graph formed by removing a single vertex from $G$ has at least one EDS, and (ii) a hypo-unique domination graph (a hypo-$mathcal{UD}$ graph) if $G$ has at least two minimum dominating sets...

We review a characterization of domination perfect graphs in terms of forbidden induced subgraphs obtained by Zverovich and Zverovich [12] using a computer code. Then we apply it to a problem of unique domination in graphs recently proposed by Fischermann and Volkmann. 1 Domination perfect graphs Let G be a graph. A set D ⊆ V (G) is a dominating set of G if each vertex of G either belongs to D ...

A set D of vertices in a graph G is a distance-k dominating set if every vertex of G either is in D or is within distance k of at least one vertex in D. A distance-k dominating set of G of minimum cardinality is called a minimum distance-k dominating set of G. For any graph G and for a subset F of the edge set of G the set F is an edge dominating set of G if every edge of G either is in D or is...

MacGillivray and Seyffarth (J. Graph Theory 22 (1996), 213–229) proved that planar graphs of diameter two have domination number at most three and planar graphs of diameter three have domination number at most ten. They also give examples of planar graphs of diameter four having arbitrarily large domination numbers. In this paper we improve on their results. We prove that there is in fact a uni...

The theory of oppositional culture, as discussed by Bonnie Mitchell and Joe Feagin (1995), suggests that African Americans, American Indians, and Mexican Americans draw on their own cultural resources to resist domination. Patricia Hill Collins suggests that Black women develop a unique vision of the social world based on their position within a matrix of domination that organizes intersecting ...