نتایج جستجو برای: validity argument

تعداد نتایج: 155496  

پایان نامه :وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری - دانشگاه پیام نور - دانشگاه پیام نور مرکز - دانشکده زبانهای خارجی 1391

the primary goal of the current project was to examine the effect of three different treatments, namely, models with explicit instruction, models with implicit instruction, and models alone on differences between the three groups of subjects in the use of the elements of argument structures in terms of toulmins (2003) model (i.e., claim, data, counterargument claim, counterargument data, rebutt...

2010
JANE GREEN Jane Green

97 There are several contexts in which randomization in research design is not possible. Researchers may be interested in the effects of large-scale events or policy initiatives, or of complex causal processes that cannot be replicated. Threats to external validity in randomized experiments will lead to greater dividends for some research questions in a quasi-experimental design. Quasi-experime...

Journal: :Synthese 2008
James A. Woodbridge Bradley Armour-Garb

Stephen Read has presented an argument for the inconsistency of the concept of validity. We extend Read’s results and show that this inconsistency is but one half of a larger problem. Like the concept of truth, validity is infectedwithwhat we call semantic pathology, a condition that actually gives rise to two symptoms: inconsistency and indeterminacy. After sketching the basic ideas behind sem...

Journal: :Mind 2023

Abstract This paper explores an idea of Stoic descent that is largely neglected nowadays, the argument valid when conditional formed by conjunction its premises as antecedent and conclusion consequent true. As will be argued, once some basic features our naïve understanding validity are properly spelled out, a suitable account conditionals adopted, equivalence between arguments true makes perfe...

Journal: :Logica Universalis 2017
Christoph Benzmüller L. Weber Bruno Woltzenlogel Paleo

We present an exemplary study in Computational Metaphysics, which is an emerging, interdisciplinary field aiming at the rigorous formalisation and deep logical assessment of rational, philosophical arguments on the computer. The particular focus here is on the ontological argument for the existence of God. While related work [9, 7] has concentrated on Anselm’s simpler original version of the on...

Journal: :Journal of educational technology and online learning 2022

The purpose of this study was to examine information sharing on social media platforms (facebook, twitter, instagram, youtube, etc.) in terms the accuracy information. Within scope study, effect systematic (argument quality, validity, aspect) and heuristic (expertise, popularity, trustworthiness) clues, which are thought have an impact decision process preservice teachers regarding attitude tow...

2012
Dimitra Tsovaltzi Armin Weinberger Oliver Scheuer Toby Dragon Bruce M. McLaren

Students use Facebook to organize their classroom experiences [1], but hardly to share and form opinions on subject matters. We explore the benefits of argument diagrams for the formation of scientific opinion on behaviorism in Facebook. We aim at raising awareness of opinion conflict and structuring the argumentation with scripts [2]. A lab study with University students (ten dyads per conditi...

1967
ARTHUR G. WASSERMAN

Section 2 concerns the classification of G-vector bundles. The precise statement is: The equivalence classes of k-dimensional G-vector bundles over M” “ subordinate ” to Pare in a natural one-to-one correspondence with the equivariant homotopy classes of maps of M into Gk( V’), the grassmannian of k-planes in V’, if t > n + k. The existence of a classifying map is proved via a transversality ar...

2009
Collin Lynch Kevin D. Ashley Niels Pinkwart Vincent Aleven

Formal and computational models of argument are ideally suited for education in ill-defined domains such as law, public policy, and science. Open-ended arguments play a central role in these areas but students of the domains may not have been taught an explicit model of argument. Computational models of argument may be ideally suited to act as argument tutors guiding students in the formation o...

2005
DOUGLAS WALTON DAVID M. GODDEN

Argumentation schemes are common types of defeasible argument evaluated with critical questions. This position paper identifies and explores some unsolved problems pertaining to critical questions, such as their argumentative effects, their connection to burden of proof, their connection to the scheme itself, and how they should be represented in argument diagrams. Discussion will use the schem...

نمودار تعداد نتایج جستجو در هر سال

با کلیک روی نمودار نتایج را به سال انتشار فیلتر کنید