Bringing Value-Based Perspectives to Care: Including Patient and Family Members in Decision-Making Processes

نویسندگان

  • Ashley Ryer Primary Health Care, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada
  • Barna Tugwell Endocrinology, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada
  • Colin Van Zoost General Internal Medicine, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada
  • Erin Christian Primary Health Care, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada
  • Graeme Kohler Primary Health Care, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada
  • Irene Higgins-Bowser Diabetes Management Centre, Primary Health Care, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada
  • Judy Porter Diabetes Management Centre, Primary Health Care, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada
  • Les Wood Diabetes Management Centre, Primary Health Care, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada
  • Lisa Bedford Diabetes Management Centre, Primary Health Care, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada
  • Lynn Edwards Primary Health Care, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada
  • Michael Vallis Behaviour Change Institute, Primary Health Care, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada
  • Rick Gibson Primary Health Care, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada
  • Susan Dunn Public Engagement, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada
  • Tara Sampalli Primary Health Care, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada
چکیده مقاله:

Background Recent evidence shows that patient engagement is an important strategy in achieving a high performing healthcare system. While there is considerable evidence of implementation initiatives in direct care context, there is limited investigation of implementation initiatives in decision-making context as it relates to program planning, service delivery and developing policies. Research has also shown a gap in consistent application of system-level strategies that can effectively translate organizational policies around patient and family engagement into practice.   Methods The broad objective of this initiative was to develop a system-level implementation strategy to include patient and family advisors (PFAs) at decision-making points in primary healthcare (PHC) based on wellestablished evidence and literature. In this opportunity sponsored by the Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement (CFHI) a co-design methodology, also well-established was applied in identifying and developing a suitable implementation strategy to engage PFAs as members of quality teams in PHC. Diabetes management centres (DMCs) was selected as the pilot site to develop the strategy. Key steps in the process included review of evidence, review of the current state in PHC through engagement of key stakeholders and a co-design approach.   Results The project team included a diverse representation of members from the PHC system including patient advisors, DMC team members, system leads, providers, Public Engagement team members and CFHI improvement coaches. Key outcomes of this 18-month long initiative included development of a working definition of patient and family engagement, development of a Patient and Family Engagement Resource Guide and evaluation of the resource guide.   Conclusion This novel initiative provided us an opportunity to develop a supportive system-wide implementation plan and a strategy to include PFAs in decision-making processes in PHC. The well-established co-design methodology further allowed us to include value-based (customer driven quality and experience of care) perspectives of several important stakeholders including patient advisors. The next step will be to implement the strategy within DMCs, spread the strategy PHC, both locally and provincially with a focus on sustainability.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

POST-DECISION PROCESSES: Consolidation and value conflicts in decision making

The studies in the present thesis focus on post-decision processes using the theoretical framework of Differentiation and Consolidation Theory. This thesis consists of three studies. In all these studies, pre-decision evaluations are compared with post-decision evaluations in order to explore differences in evaluations of decision alternatives before and after a decision. The main aim of the st...

متن کامل

Long Term Care and Family Decision Making

The goal of this project is to develop and estimate realistic models of family decision making concerning long-term care of elderly parents. My theoretical and empirical models are rich in the sense that family members face a wide range of options including nursing home care, formal care provided in the elderly individual’s home (home health care), informal care, and no care. Despite the rich s...

متن کامل

Bringing evidence to healthcare decision making.

key principle underlying the Excellent Care for All Act was the importance of evidence in guiding decisions across the healthcare system. The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) has led pan-Canadian efforts for several years to bring evidence to decisions about what will be covered and what will not be covered in Canadian healthcare. In this interview, the CEO of CADTH ...

متن کامل

What influences patient decision-making in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis multidisciplinary care? A study of patient perspectives

BACKGROUND Patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are required to make decisions concerning quality of life and symptom management over the course of their disease. Clinicians perceive that patients' ability to engage in timely decision-making is extremely challenging. However, we lack patient perspectives on this issue. This study aimed to explore patient experiences of ALS, and to ...

متن کامل

patient involvement in health care decision making: a review

background: patient participation means involvement of the patient in decision making or expressing opinions about different treatment methods, which includes sharing information, feelings and signs and accepting health team instructions. objectives: given the importance of patient participation in healthcare decision making which empowers patients and improves services and health outcomes, thi...

متن کامل

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ذخیره در منابع من قبلا به منابع من ذحیره شده

{@ msg_add @}


عنوان ژورنال

دوره 6  شماره 11

صفحات  661- 668

تاریخ انتشار 2017-11-01

با دنبال کردن یک ژورنال هنگامی که شماره جدید این ژورنال منتشر می شود به شما از طریق ایمیل اطلاع داده می شود.

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023