The papers in this issue arose from a conference on the Psychological and Cognitive Foundations of Religiosity that took place at Emory University (Atlanta, Georgia) in August, 2003. 1 This conference brought together scholars from ten nations and six disciplines (psychology, anthropology, religious studies, biology, philosophy, and cognitive science) to explore new developments at the interfac...

Science is expected to be objective: however, since practiced and produced by humans, it has to reflect human flows - prejudices, stubbornness, malice, and the tendency to be misused. No wonder an excellent scientist like John Eccles proclaimed science to be among the most personal activities he had known. By analysing a few examples from the history of science (in particular the intellectual d...

In their article “Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science” (Theology & Science 2020), Petteri Nieminen colleagues compare the use evidence religion science. Their claim is that religious characterized by “experiential” thinking confirmation bias, which makes integration with science difficult. I argue, however, methodology unreliable theory cognition too simplistic. Further research ...

I have seen and heard so many arguments around this topic recently. It can be a real hot button issue in certain circles. Schools, Churches, other organizations banned yoga from their buildings because they think the is religion. not true way of life it an integrated system education for body, mind inner spirit. This art right living was imbibed practiced India thousands years ago, science deal...