with the development of e-commerce in the recent couple of decades, one of the newly-emerged subjects in global communications and virtual space is hoarding in e-commerce. hoarding is entailing the common essential commodities in order to expect the prices to increase; and in jurisprudence its scope is limited to the four cereals, oil, and edible oil. entailing and storage of public essential n...

When the Second Circuit decided McKithen v. Brown, it joined an ever-growing list of courts faced with a difficult and pressing issue of both constitutional and criminal law: is there a federal constitutional right of post-conviction access to evidence for DNA testing? This issue, which sits at the intersection of new forensic technologies and fundamental principles of constitutional due proces...

As Fotaki (2019) argues, the current political climate in Europe is threatening principles of humanitarianism, particularly among refugees and asylum seekers. This commentary builds on that argument, with a spotlight on mental health and culturally relevant service design. By addressing some of the barriers faced by refugees and asylum seekers in accessing mental health...

Abstract The right to freedom of thought is guaranteed by Article 13 the American Convention on Human Rights, yet current jurisprudence interprets as a mere dimension expression, also protected 13. Contemporary neurotechnology research presents possibility for human thoughts be tracked, recorded, analysed and predicted. This applies pressure upon Inter-American Court Rights’ understanding thoug...

Deciding a patent’s validity is costly, and so is deciding it incorrectly. Judges and juries must expend significant resources in order to reach a patent validity determination that is properly informed by the relevant facts. At the same time, patent validity determinations reached quickly and cheaply may conserve resources today while creating future costs. Wrongly preserving an invalid patent...

Any particular rule, procedure, or role may be therapeutic, antitherapeutic, both, or neither. This forms the basic tenet of David Wexler and Bruce Winick's construct, "Therapeutic Jurisprudence."' Therapeutic jurisprudence is concerned with the extent to which the law itself causes or contributes to psychological dysfunction or "juridical psychopathology," a concept similar to that of iatrogen...

A growing debate on the imposition of digital services tax emerged as one latest trade war battlegrounds. Indonesia and European Union (EU) are among countries that have taken unilateral actions to implement tax. This paper examines (i) regulation in EU (ii) whether violates non-discrimination principles WTO according GATS. By comparing statutory practice EU, this work concludes firstly, is reg...

besides the necessity of gaining the prerequisites of tafsir, the views of the early scholars about these prerequisites also had to be considered. the present article is to make clear that most of the exegetes did not really meet the prerequisites mentioned in their own preface. it also discuses about the preliminary sciences to tafsir which may be classified into seven general groups with some...

“obligation”, “dette” and “droit personnel” are three important and correlative legal terms in civil law that have been introduce into persian legal literature with improper translation. the failure to distinguish them from common terms in islamic jurisprudence like “dein” and “eltezam” have caused conceptual confusion between special terms of two great legal systems: civil law and islamic law....