National Green Tribunal is a unique forum for adjudging matters relating to environmental protection, prior which the same role was played by higher judiciary exercising constitutional jurisdiction. Hence it quite obvious have concern over constitution of Tribunal. The ability NGT upkeep right safeguard environment be experienced from its functioning. Crossing ten years, ideal analyzing effecti...

a little deliberation on the contents of the contracts concluded between the real and legal persons reveals that nowadays the nullifying condition is gradually being included as one of the conditions of contracts. the legitimacy of this position of suspending the forcible dissolution of contract in shī‘a jurisprudence is the subject of a fundamental research, which the present article attempts ...

Gerald Postema offers a gentle but damning critique of contemporary analytic jurisprudence for being antisocial , anti-philosophical, ahistorical, and, ultimately, mistaken not only about the province of jurisprudence but the nature of law. He also offers an elegant restatement of what jurisprudence with a wider ambition must be like; and it is a jurisprudence in which time and history are cent...

one of the most widely used rules of jurisprudence is ‘impediment removal’ often expressed by the phrase ‘when impediment is removed, the forbidden is regained.’ the application of this rule in jurisprudential matters produces important outcomes since impediment in those matters can prevent the penetration (validity) of the primary ruling, and as a result, the secondary ruling would be issued a...

Abstract Within their different mandates, the ICJ and ICC have decided on compensation for mass atrocities, including same factual scenarios related dual state/individual responsibility. However, no publication has examined these developments jointly comparatively. Thus, this article seeks to determine how both courts are should be developing jurisprudence atrocity cases. This suggests that two...