• Detecting stability is a CoNP-complete problem in dynamic argumentation. A claim stable if more information cannot change its justification status. We propose sound and polynomial approximation algorithm for estimating stability. provide empirical theoretical analyses of the algorithm’s performance. The applied three use cases at Netherlands Police. In argument-based inquiry, agents jointly c...

The problem of disagreement is one the most important issues that have been debated in epistemology recent years, and particular peer disagreement. main question this what kind attitude we should rationally adopt when realize someone who an epistemic to us does not think same. There are four responses question: conciliationism, steadfastness, total evidence view, justificationist view. Accordin...

Instead of the problematic reasoning presented in the work of D. J. Braun [Phys. Rev. E 78, 016213 (2008)], a rigorous argument is provided to show the validity of the adaptive controller proposed by Braun under some particular assumptions. Without these assumptions, this controller may be failed to stabilize the unsteady state, which is numerically shown by specific examples. Also, the choice ...

It is often argued that experiments are strong on causal identification (internal validity) but weak on generalizability (external validity). One widely accepted way to limit threats to external validity is to incorporate as much variation in the background conditions and in the covariates as possible through replication. Another strategy is to make the theoretical foundations of the experiment...

The design argument is one of three main arguments for the existence of God; the others are the ontological argument and the cosmological argument. Unlike the ontological argument, the design argument and the cosmological argument are a posteriori. And whereas the cosmological argument can focus on any present event to get the ball rolling (arguing that it must trace back to a first cause, name...

Abstract To stretch an argument means to make a political that is slightly (but not glaringly) invalid. I add existing research, which focuses on the analysis of facts and stark binary views validity by introducing concept argument-stretching, identifies subtle violations arguments. Using this conceptual foundation, outline impression-formation theory explain impact argument-stretching public o...

A quantum fractal is a wavefunction with a real and an imaginary part continuous everywhere, but differentiable nowhere. This lack of differentiability has been used as an argument to deny the general validity of Bohmian mechanics (and other trajectory–based approaches) in providing a complete interpretation of quantum mechanics. Here, this assertion is overcome by means of a formal extension o...