analyses1917.8 Themes of seventy-two French verbs1937.9 Identical French conjugations1957.10 Concrete plat of stem formatives for seventy-two French conjugations1967.11 Abstract plat of stem formatives for seventy-two French conjugations1997.12 Optimal static principal-part analyses for French (concrete analysis)2027.13 Optimal static principal-pa...

This paper presents a morphological classification of languages from the IR perspective. Linguistic typology research has shown that the morphological complexity of each language of the world can be described by two variables, index of synthesis and index of fusion. These variables provide a theoretical basis for IR research handling morphological issues. A common theoretical framework is neede...

This paper is in line with the principles of numerical taxonomy and with the program of holistic typology. It integrates the level of phonology with the morphological and syntactical level by correlating metric properties (such as n of phonemes per syllable and n of syllables per clause) with non-metric variables such as the number of morphological cases and adposition order. The study of cross...

In many languages, the stress pattern of a complex word resembles the stress of its morphological base or another related word. I refer to this phenomenon as accentual faithfulness (cf. Alderete 1999). A classic example comes from the English word orìginálity, which resembles the accentual profile of its immediate subconstituent oríginal (cf. monomorphemic words like Mèditerránean). This paper ...

This paper advances the case that linguistics requires a unified theory of number, serviceable to both semantics and morphology, by proving that the morphological concept of augmentation and the semantic concept of cumulation are near logical equivalents. From this emerge an inventory of number features incorporating the categories ‘paucal’ and ‘unit augmented’, a typology of number systems cro...

The cross-linguistic study of morphological structure has a long and rich tradition that is connected to the very beginnings of language typology. Proposals going back to the end of the 18 and start of the 19 century (cf. e.g. Ramat 2010, 16-17, Plank 2001) have survived remarkably well into modern-day typology (see e.g. Aikhenvald 2007 for a modern version), which can be seen as a tribute to q...