U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence undermines access to contraception by permitting individuals, institutions, and even corporations to claim religious objections to ensuring contraceptive insurance coverage, thus imposing those beliefs on non-adherents and jeopardizing their access to essential reproductive-health services. This jurisprudence is not only harmful but also runs contrary to the law...

a research on “developing the jurisprudence into the sanctum of the beliefs and abstract deedsmr. mohammad sadegh yousefi moghadam mr. seyed jafar sadeghi fadaki abstract from among the subjects of discussion which have been paid much attention by the islamic scientists since long ago, we can name the domain of jurisprudence, religious duties of human being and the limits thereto and in this re...

Gerald Postema offers a gentle but damning critique of contemporary analytic jurisprudence for being antisocial , anti-philosophical, ahistorical, and, ultimately, mistaken not only about the province of jurisprudence but the nature of law. He also offers an elegant restatement of what jurisprudence with a wider ambition must be like; and it is a jurisprudence in which time and history are cent...

the religious jurisprudence laws are one of the issues of religious rules and principles which can be researched from two aspects: the first aspect is that the available laws should be restudied or some new rules should be researched and the second aspect is that from the outside viewpoint the religious jurisprudence law should be researched and the philosophy of the laws should be compiled. th...

one of the important issues in the humanities in general and in religious studies in particular is the comprehension of the meaning of the text. dealing with the theoretical bases of interpretation and comprehension of the text, hermeneutics is a branch of the humanities which fully serves this objective. the same objective is likewise followed in the study of the principles of jurisprudence (u...